In every thriving industry, competition serves as the invisible hand that guides innovation, maintains fair pricing, and ensures businesses receive genuine value from their suppliers. The logistics technology sector is no exception. As customs brokers, freight forwarders, and logistics service providers increasingly rely on software as the operational backbone of their businesses, understanding the dynamics of competitive markets becomes not just interesting, but strategically essential.

Competition isn't an abstract economic concept. It's the practical reality that shapes your daily operations, your cost structure, and your ability to adapt as your business grows. When markets function competitively, you benefit from continuous innovation, fair pricing, responsive service, and the strategic flexibility to change direction when your needs evolve. When competition weakens, these advantages gradually erode, often so slowly that the cumulative impact only becomes apparent when businesses find themselves with limited options and constrained flexibility.

‍

How Competitive Markets Drive Value

The benefits of competitive markets manifest in tangible ways that directly affect business operations. When multiple providers vie for your custom, they must continuously innovate to earn and retain your business. This competitive pressure drives companies to invest heavily in product development, improve user experiences, and solve operational challenges that matter to their customers. Innovation becomes a necessity rather than an option, and companies cannot rest on past achievements or market position alone.

This dynamic extends beyond product features into pricing discipline. When businesses can credibly evaluate alternatives and switch providers if necessary, vendors must offer fair value to retain customers. The ability to negotiate, compare offerings, and exercise choice naturally constrains pricing power. This proves particularly valuable for small and medium-sized operators working with tight margins, where software costs represent a significant operational expense. The mere existence of credible alternatives creates leverage, even if you never exercise the option to switch.

Competitive markets also elevate customer service quality. When providers know that disappointed customers have viable alternatives, they cannot afford to deliver substandard support or become unresponsive to operational needs. This competitive pressure maintains service quality across all customer segments, ensuring that smaller accounts receive attention and responsiveness rather than being deprioritised in favour of enterprise relationships.

Perhaps most importantly, competitive markets provide strategic flexibility. Multiple viable options mean you're not locked into a single provider's roadmap, pricing structure, or strategic direction. This flexibility proves invaluable when your business needs evolve, when you enter new markets, or when vendor priorities shift away from your operational requirements. The ability to adapt your technology strategy to your business strategy, rather than the reverse, represents a fundamental strategic advantage.

Competition also enables market segmentation and specialisation. When multiple providers compete, some can focus on specific customer segments with tailored solutions. This specialisation often delivers better outcomes for businesses whose needs differ from large enterprise accounts, as providers can optimise their products, pricing, and support models for particular operational contexts rather than attempting one-size-fits-all approaches.

‍

The Gradual Erosion When Competition Weakens

The inverse of these benefits becomes apparent when markets consolidate and competition weakens, though the changes rarely announce themselves dramatically. Instead, they emerge gradually as market structure evolves, making it easy to overlook the cumulative impact.

Pricing typically increases over time as negotiating leverage shifts towards dominant providers. Without credible alternatives to consider, businesses find themselves with less ability to resist price increases or negotiate favourable contract terms. For smaller operators already working with thin margins, these cost pressures directly impact competitiveness and profitability.

Innovation patterns shift as well. Development focus gravitates towards the needs of the largest, most valuable customers. Features and improvements that would benefit smaller operators - simplified workflows, flexible pricing models, regional functionality - may receive less attention as providers optimise their roadmaps for enterprise accounts. The innovation continues, but its direction may no longer align with the needs of significant portions of the market.

Customer service gradually becomes less personalised as providers manage larger customer bases with diminished competitive pressure to differentiate on service quality. Response times lengthen, support becomes more transactional, and the relationship evolves from partnership towards a more routine vendor-customer dynamic. Account size begins to matter more for service priority and access to technical resources.

Strategic lock-in deepens as switching costs accumulate and alternatives diminish. The longer you operate on a particular platform, the more deeply integrated it becomes with your processes, data, and staff capabilities. When the number of credible alternatives decreases, these switching costs translate into reduced flexibility. Your technology choices begin to constrain your business strategy rather than enabling it.

These dynamics don't appear overnight. They emerge gradually as market structure changes, which makes them particularly insidious. By the time businesses recognise the cumulative impact, they often find themselves with limited options and significant obstacles to change.

‍

Understanding Market Consolidation: The WiseTech-E2Open Example

Recent developments in the logistics technology sector illustrate how consolidation affects competitive dynamics. WiseTech Global's $2.1 billion acquisition of E2Open Parent Holdings, completed in 2025, represents the largest transaction in the company's history and significantly alters the competitive landscape.

The acquisition brings several important platforms under WiseTech's control, most notably BluJay Solutions and Expedient - both widely considered direct competitors to CargoWise in freight forwarding and customs brokerage software. By acquiring these primary alternatives, WiseTech effectively removes credible competing platforms that logistics service providers might otherwise have adopted. The irony is particularly striking: through acquiring E2Open, WiseTech now owns Expedient, a product that directly competed with its own CargoWise platform.

This consolidation extends WiseTech's already substantial market position. The company has completed over 55 acquisitions since its 2016 IPO, systematically integrating acquired functionality into its CargoWise platform. The E2Open acquisition, however, represents a quantum leap in scale - its enterprise value exceeds the combined value of all WiseTech's previous acquisitions.

For customs brokers and freight forwarders, this consolidation creates several practical considerations. The number of credible global alternatives has decreased significantly, with two major competing platforms now under single ownership. This limits options when evaluating technology strategies or seeking to negotiate better terms. With less competition, pricing discipline naturally weakens over time, and smaller operators may find it increasingly difficult to negotiate favourable contract terms without the leverage that enterprise-scale customers possess.

As platforms grow through acquisition, development focus tends to shift towards larger enterprise customers. SME-specific requirements - simplified workflows, flexible pricing models, regional functionality - may receive less attention. Maintaining personalised customer service also becomes more challenging as companies grow, and smaller brokers may experience different service levels compared to enterprise accounts as support teams manage expanded customer bases.

When a company acquires competing products, decisions must be made about which platforms to maintain, develop, or sunset. Customers on acquired platforms face uncertainty about long-term product support and potential migration requirements.

This isn't a criticism of WiseTech's acquisition strategy, which follows clear business logic and has proven highly effective. Rather, it illustrates how consolidation naturally affects market dynamics and customer choice - patterns that occur across many industries as markets mature.

‍

Competition in Practice: Broader Lessons

Beyond specific transactions, observing how market consolidation affects competitive dynamics across industries provides valuable insights into why competition matters.

Consider the retail industry's evolution over the past two decades. The rise of e-commerce created both opportunities and challenges, but markets where multiple strong competitors emerged - from established retailers adapting their models to pure-play online specialists to niche providers focusing on specific categories - demonstrated more innovation, better customer experiences, and more competitive pricing than markets that consolidated quickly around single dominant players. The presence of alternatives drove continuous improvement across the entire sector.

The software industry more broadly shows similar patterns. Markets with healthy competition amongst multiple viable providers consistently deliver more innovation, more competitive pricing, and better customer outcomes than highly consolidated markets. When developers and businesses have genuine choices, providers must continuously earn customer loyalty rather than relying on market position or switching costs to retain accounts.

Within logistics technology, these patterns manifest in practical ways. The question isn't whether consolidation happens - market dynamics often drive it - but rather how to maintain sufficient competition to preserve the benefits that competitive markets deliver.

‍

The Small Business Perspective

Small and medium-sized customs brokers and logistics providers experience these market dynamics differently than larger enterprises. Without enterprise-scale purchasing power, smaller operators have less leverage in vendor negotiations. What works for large accounts - pricing structures, implementation approaches, support models - may not translate effectively to SME operational needs or budgets.

Enterprise-focused platforms often assume resources and technical capabilities that smaller operators may not possess. Complex implementations can strain teams and delay operational benefits. Development roadmaps optimised for enterprise needs may not address the specific workflows, simplification requirements, or regional functionality that smaller operators prioritise. When markets consolidate and providers focus on maximising revenue from larger accounts, these gaps tend to widen rather than narrow.

Cost absorption presents ongoing challenges. Already operating on thin margins, smaller businesses find it difficult to absorb software cost increases or restructured pricing models. These costs directly impact competitiveness and profitability, yet smaller operators have limited ability to push back against price increases when alternatives diminish.

Support quality becomes increasingly variable. Tiered support models and resource allocation decisions can result in longer response times and less personalised assistance for smaller accounts, precisely when responsive support proves most valuable. The relationship shifts from partnership towards transaction, and the personalised attention that smaller operators often need becomes harder to secure.

These challenges don't affect every business equally, but they represent common patterns that emerge as markets consolidate. Understanding these dynamics helps smaller operators make more informed technology decisions and advocate more effectively for their needs.

‍

Why New Competition Matters

Market consolidation creates opportunities for innovative competitors focused on underserved segments. This new competition proves particularly valuable when it addresses specific pain points that larger, consolidated platforms may overlook.

New entrants can build modern architectures from the ground up rather than maintaining legacy systems. Cloud-native platforms and API-first designs offer flexibility, easier integrations, and more straightforward deployment. Without the burden of supporting decades-old code or complex acquisitions to integrate, new competitors can move more quickly and focus resources on solving current problems rather than maintaining historical decisions.

Pricing models can evolve to better match customer needs. Rather than following industry-wide price increase patterns, new entrants can offer transparent pricing that scales with customer growth and aligns costs with business outcomes. Value-based approaches that tie pricing to actual usage or benefits delivered create fairer relationships than models optimised for maximum revenue extraction.

Specialisation becomes possible when new competitors focus on specific market segments. Solutions designed specifically for small and medium-sized operators can address their workflows, pricing structures, support needs, and growth trajectories rather than assuming enterprise operational models. This focus often delivers better outcomes than attempting to serve all segments with a single approach.

Smaller, focused teams can respond more rapidly to customer feedback and market changes. Without the bureaucracy that often accompanies large organisations, new entrants can iterate quickly on features that matter most to their target segments. Product development becomes more responsive and more closely aligned with actual customer needs.

Perhaps most importantly, new competition changes the relationship dynamic. When providers view customer growth as essential to their own success, genuine partnerships emerge. The focus shifts from maximising platform adoption and revenue extraction towards delivering value that drives mutual success. This alignment of interests creates healthier, more sustainable relationships.

The emergence of such alternatives benefits the entire market by maintaining competitive pressure, driving continued innovation, and ensuring businesses have genuine choices that align with their operational needs. Even customers who remain with established providers benefit when those providers must compete more actively for their business.

‍

Evaluating Technology Strategies in Consolidating Markets

When markets consolidate, technology decision-making requires more careful attention to long-term implications beyond immediate functionality requirements. Several considerations warrant particular focus.

Understanding total cost of ownership becomes essential. Initial licensing costs represent only one component of true expense. Implementation costs, ongoing support fees, training requirements, and potential future price increases all contribute to the real cost of a technology platform. More importantly, understanding how pricing structures may evolve over contract lifecycles - and how much leverage you'll have to resist future increases - provides crucial insight into long-term financial implications.

Switching costs deserve careful evaluation. Deeply integrated platforms create significant obstacles to change through data migration complexity, process changes, staff retraining, and operational disruption. These costs affect long-term strategic flexibility. The deeper the integration and the longer you operate on a particular platform, the higher the barriers to change become. Understanding these dynamics upfront helps you preserve optionality.

Vendor dependency merits honest assessment. Consider how dependent your operations would become on a single technology provider. What happens if vendor priorities shift? If pricing changes substantially? If service quality declines? If the company pursues a strategic direction that no longer aligns with your needs? The answers to these questions reveal how much risk you're accepting through vendor concentration.

Development roadmap alignment requires scrutiny. Does the provider's development direction align with your operational needs and growth trajectory? Enterprise-focused features may deliver limited value if your operational context differs significantly. Understanding whose needs drive the roadmap - and whether yours align - helps assess whether the platform will continue meeting your requirements as both your business and the product evolve.

Support quality investigation pays dividends. Beyond contractual commitments, investigate actual responsiveness, personalisation, and accessibility. Talk to existing customers with similar profiles to yours. Understand whether account size affects support priority and access to technical resources. Service quality often matters more than features, particularly when problems arise.

Maintaining awareness of alternatives preserves strategic flexibility. Even if you're satisfied with your current provider, understanding what alternatives exist and periodically evaluating them provides leverage in vendor discussions and ensures you're positioned to act if circumstances change. Active evaluation of emerging competitors and alternative platforms isn't disloyal - it's prudent business practice.

Contract flexibility deserves attention during negotiations. Terms that preserve optionality rather than committing to extended lock-in periods protect your ability to adapt as circumstances change. Ensure contract terms align with your business growth trajectory and changing needs rather than optimising for vendor revenue predictability at your expense.

‍

Supporting Healthy Competition

A healthy logistics technology market requires active participation from all stakeholders, not just passive observation of market dynamics.

For businesses, this means critically evaluating technology choices beyond immediate functionality. Consider long-term implications of vendor concentration and actively explore emerging alternatives. Your purchasing decisions shape market dynamics. Supporting new entrants focused on serving your needs helps maintain the competitive pressure that benefits everyone. This doesn't mean avoiding established providers - it means making informed choices and maintaining awareness of options.

For technology providers, maintaining market health means focusing on genuine customer value rather than simply leveraging market position. Pricing discipline, investment in meaningful innovation, and consistent service quality across all customer segments build sustainable competitive advantages. The companies that thrive long-term are those that earn loyalty through value delivery rather than depending on switching costs and limited alternatives to retain customers.

The industry as a whole benefits from supporting new entrants focused on underserved markets. Recognising that healthy competition drives innovation, maintains fair pricing, and ensures strategic flexibility helps everyone appreciate the value of maintaining multiple viable alternatives. Industry associations, trade publications, and professional networks can amplify voices advocating for competitive markets.

Regulators play a role in monitoring market concentration and its impact on pricing power, customer choice, and innovation. As consolidation continues, examining whether trends require attention from competition policy perspectives protects market health. Not all consolidation proves problematic, but regulatory awareness helps ensure markets continue serving the businesses that depend on them.

‍

Looking Forward

Market competition isn't simply a nice-to-have feature of healthy industries - it's a strategic asset that directly impacts business operations, cost structure, and long-term flexibility. In logistics technology, where software increasingly serves as the operational backbone of customs brokers and freight forwarders, these considerations carry particular weight.

As industry consolidation continues, maintaining awareness of competitive dynamics becomes increasingly important. Understanding how market structure affects pricing, innovation, service quality, and strategic options enables better decision-making when selecting and evaluating technology partners.

The goal isn't to oppose successful companies or criticise legitimate acquisition strategies. Rather, it's to recognise how market structure shapes business realities and to support the competitive dynamics that drive innovation, ensure fair value, and preserve the choices that enable businesses to thrive.

Technology should enable business growth, not constrain it. Ensuring that competitive markets continue to deliver these benefits requires attention, active evaluation of alternatives, and willingness to support new entrants focused on serving your needs.

The customs broker and freight forwarding technology market continues to evolve. How effectively it serves the businesses that depend on these platforms will depend significantly on maintaining the competitive dynamics that drive innovation, discipline pricing, and ensure genuine customer choice. Your technology decisions - and your willingness to evaluate alternatives - play a role in shaping that future.

‍

‍

‍

At Gondola, we're building logistics software designed specifically for customs brokers and freight forwarders who value partnership, transparency, and customer-focused innovation. We believe competition drives better outcomes for everyone in the industry. If you're evaluating your technology strategy or exploring alternatives to incumbent platforms, we'd appreciate your perspective on what modern logistics software should deliver.

Get in touch with our team to discuss your technology requirements and explore whether Gondola aligns with your operational needs and strategic objectives.

‍